
low
0.0
This grove is ranked Low for Relative Overall Vulnerability due to:
Wildfire Vulnerability
Low - 0.0
Regen Vulnerability
Low - 0.0
See the Grove Health & Resilience section below for more information.
low
0.0
This grove is ranked Low for Relative Management Priority due to:
Overall Vulnerability
Low - 0.0
Treatment Feasibility
Good - 10.0
See the Management Considerations section below for more information.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Grove Size (Acres) | 42 |
| Location | Upper Kaweah Watershed, Tulare County |
| Management Unit(s) | Case Mountain Extensive Recreation Management Area |
| Land Steward(s) | DOI BLM |
Case Mountain Grove is a 42-acre grove in the Kaweah River Watershed region situated between 5,475 - 6,376 feet elevation at 36.41416°N. It is located six miles east of the town of Three Rivers, CA, in the headwaters of Salt Creek and other tributaries to the East Fork of the Kaweah River. The grove is managed by Case Mountain Extensive Recreation Management Area and is part of the Case Mountain Complex - the only sequoia groves managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Case Mountain Grove is not remote, but it can only be accessed via an 11-mile primitive dirt road that climbs about 5,000 ft. Accessing and using the road is dependent upon weather conditions; the road can get washed out and clay components in the soil can make it very difficult to drive on after inclement weather. Vehicle access is currently limited to BLM personnel and private landowners. The general public can access the grove by foot, equestrian and mountain bike travel only. Portions of Case Mountain Grove were logged in the 1940s and 1950s but it contains areas with old growth sequoias.
Case Mountain Grove is ranked Low for Relative Overall Vulnerability because it is at a Low risk of being negatively impacted by the effects of severe wildfire and at Low risk for inadequate natural regeneration.
Additionally, Case Mountain Grove is at Moderate risk for negative impacts from drought stress, Medium levels of tree mortality have been detected in the grove, and the presence and activity of beetles in the grove is None Observed. 90.10000000000001% of Case Mountain Grove has burned in large fires since 1984. See below for more detailed information.
low
0.0
Relative Overall Vulnerability is based on Wildfire Vulnerability and Regeneration Vulnerability using an area-weighted calculation. See Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for more details.
The pie charts below provide the percentage of the grove with high, medium, and low vulnerabilities. Click on the charts to view interactive maps of these vulnerabilities within the grove.
Below is additional information about Case Mountain Grove's Health & Resilience. These data, their inputs, and any available notes and updates may be found in the Grove Resilience Datasheet.
Beetle Activity in Case Mountain Grove has not been observed by grove managers.
Please see the Grove Resilience Datasheet for details.
The drought- and insect-related mortality of all tree species combined in Case Mountain Grove is estimated as Medium according to USFS dead canopy surveys from 2017-2021. Please see Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for details.
The table below provides information about large wildfires in this grove recorded since 1984. See this map of wildfires and locations of high severity fire.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Wildfires | CASE - 1987 |
| % of grove burned | 90.10000000000001% |
| % of grove unburned | 9.9% |
| Fire Return Interval Departure | High |
The chart below provides the percentages of the grove burned at different levels of severity for each wildfire since 1984.
Case Mountain Grove is ranked Low for Relative Management Priority because it has Low Relative Overall Vulnerability and Good feasibility for implementing management actions toward restoration goals.
Additionally, the grove is 2.4 miles from a community and is 4.8 miles from recreational infrastructure. There are historic skid trails that could be used to implement management activities. Restoration treatments are sometimes infeasible due to steepness in the grove, but feasibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. There is a presence of pre-settlement and historic archeological sites. See below for more detailed information.
low
0.0
Relative Management Priority is determined by combining the Relative Overall Vulnerability and Treatment Feasibility ranks. See Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for more details.
Low - 0.0
See the Health & Resilience section above for the component metrics for the Relative Overall Vulnerability rank.
good - 10.0
| Factor | Value |
|---|---|
| Special Land Designation | None |
| Grove Manager Opinion | Fuel Treatments are Possible |
| Remote | No |
Below is additional information relevant to Case Mountain Grove's Management Considerations. These data, their inputs, and any available notes and updates may be found in the Grove Resilience Datasheet.
The table below lists treatment projects in and 90 meters around this grove implemented since 2022. See this map of grove treatments.
| Treatment Type | % of Grove | Acres |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Treatments | 67.8% | 96.5 |
| Prescribed Fire | 0% | 0 |
| Pile Treatments | 0% | 0 |
| Pile Burns | 92.4% | 131.6 |
| Replanting | 0% | 0 |
The table below provides an estimate of the percentage and acreage of the grove that are recommended for evaluation for treatment based on the Vulnerability Models. See this map of Grove Vulnerability Models.
| Treatment Need | % of Grove | Acres |
|---|---|---|
| Fuels Reduction/Restoration | 0% | 0 |
| Reforestation | 0% | 0 |


Find more giant sequoia science by searching the GSLC Scientific Publications Library.
Explore more groves or learn about the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition.
The information presented in the Giant Sequoia Grove Health & Resilience Assessment is intended to supplement on-the-ground knowledge of giant sequoia groves for use in conjunction with current on-the-ground knowledge of grove condition and management activities when planning fuel treatment and reforestation projects. It should not be considered the only source of information about the condition of groves.