Giant Sequoia Grove Health & Resilience Assessment 2026

Long Meadow Grove

Long Meadow Grove

Overview

Health & Resilience Summary

moderate

2.8

This grove is ranked Moderate for Relative Overall Vulnerability due to:

Wildfire Vulnerability

Low - 0.3

Regen Vulnerability

Moderate - 2.8

See the Grove Health & Resilience section below for more information.

medium

2.8

This grove is ranked Medium for Relative Management Priority due to:

Overall Vulnerability

Moderate - 2.8

Treatment Feasibility

Good - 10.0

See the Management Considerations section below for more information.

Grove Map

Grove map

Grove Map - click map for more detailed spatial information

Grove Information

PropertyValue
Grove Size (Acres)214
LocationUpper Kern Watershed, Tulare County
Management Unit(s)Giant Sequoia National Monument / Sequoia National Forest
Land Steward(s)USFS SQF GSNM

About Long Meadow Grove

Long Meadow Grove is a 214-acre grove in the Tule and Kern River Watershed region situated between 6,136 - 7,127 feet elevation at 35.98176°N. It is located on the slope that is north of the Western Divide Highway and extends to the crest of Table Mountain. A small portion of the grove is on the Horse Meadow Creek watershed side of Table Mountain ridge. The grove falls within the Long Meadow Creek drainage, in the Kern River watershed. Long Meadow Grove is managed by Giant Sequoia National Monument/Sequoia National Forest and is one of the most accessible groves in the Monument. The popular Trail of 100 Giants winds through this Long Meadow Grove and there is high recreation use in the area. Old growth sequoias have never been logged, however, in the mid-1980’s some of the grove was heavily logged for non-sequoia conifers.

Long Meadow Grove

Health & Resilience

Long Meadow Grove is ranked Moderate for Relative Overall Vulnerability because it is at a Low risk of being negatively impacted by the effects of severe wildfire and at Moderate risk for inadequate natural regeneration.

Additionally, Long Meadow Grove is at Moderate risk for negative impacts from drought stress, Low levels of tree mortality have been detected in the grove, and the presence and activity of beetles in the grove is Unknown. 100% of Long Meadow Grove has burned in large fires since 1984. See below for more detailed information.

moderate

2.8

Relative Overall Vulnerability
Components of Relative Overall Vulnerability

Relative Overall Vulnerability is based on Wildfire Vulnerability and Regeneration Vulnerability using an area-weighted calculation. See Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for more details.

The pie charts below provide the percentage of the grove with high, medium, and low vulnerabilities. Click on the charts to view interactive maps of these vulnerabilities within the grove.

Additional Grove Health & Resilience Information

Below is additional information about Long Meadow Grove's Health & Resilience. These data, their inputs, and any available notes and updates may be found in the Grove Resilience Datasheet.

Beetle Activity
unknown

Beetle Activity in Long Meadow Grove has not been determined.

Please see the Grove Resilience Datasheet for details.

Drought-related Tree Mortality (all species)
low

The drought- and insect-related mortality of all tree species combined in Long Meadow Grove is estimated as Low according to USFS dead canopy surveys from 2017-2021. Please see Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for details.

Wildfire History

The table below provides information about large wildfires in this grove recorded since 1984. See this map of wildfires and locations of high severity fire.

MetricValue
WildfiresWINDY - 2021, MEADOW - 2016
% of grove burned 100%
% of grove unburned 0%
Fire Return Interval Departure High

The chart below provides the percentages of the grove burned at different levels of severity for each wildfire since 1984.

0 - Unburned
1 - Low to Moderate Severity (<640RdNBR)
2 - High Severity (640-800RdNBR)
3 - Very High Severity (>800RdNBR)

Long Meadow Grove

Management Considerations

Long Meadow Grove is ranked Medium for Relative Management Priority because it has Moderate Relative Overall Vulnerability and Good feasibility for implementing management actions toward restoration goals.

Additionally, the grove is 5.9 miles from a community and contains recreational infrastructure. There is a high amount of outdoor recreation use in this grove. See below for more detailed information.

medium

2.8

Relative Management Priority
Components of Relative Management Priority

Relative Management Priority is determined by combining the Relative Overall Vulnerability and Treatment Feasibility ranks. See Grove Assessment Analysis Methods for more details.

Relative Overall Vulnerability

Moderate - 2.8

See the Health & Resilience section above for the component metrics for the Relative Overall Vulnerability rank.

Treatment Feasibility

good - 10.0

FactorValue
Special Land DesignationNone
Grove Manager OpinionFuel Treatments are Possible
RemoteNo
Additional Management Considerations

Below is additional information relevant to Long Meadow Grove's Management Considerations. These data, their inputs, and any available notes and updates may be found in the Grove Resilience Datasheet.

Treatment History

The table below lists treatment projects in and 90 meters around this grove implemented since 2022. See this map of grove treatments.

Treatment Type % of GroveAcres
Mechanical Treatments12.7%58.3
Prescribed Fire18.2%83.7
Pile Treatments90.4%414.6
Pile Burns90.7%416.1
Replanting14.6%66.8

Management Recommendations

The table below provides an estimate of the percentage and acreage of the grove that are recommended for evaluation for treatment based on the Vulnerability Models. See this map of Grove Vulnerability Models.

Treatment Need % of GroveAcres
Fuels Reduction/Restoration0%0
Reforestation28.5%60.99

Long Meadow Grove

Photos

Jun 2022
postfire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Jun 2022
postfire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Jun 2022
postfire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and 2016 Meadow Fire
Jun 2022
postfire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire
Jun 2022
postfire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire
Post-fire stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire
Nov 2023
posttreatment
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Nov 2023
posttreatment
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Nov 2023
posttreatment
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Open stand conditions in the Long Meadow Grove following the 2021 Windy Fire and implementation of post-fire fuel reduction treatments
Nov 2023
pretreatment
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires
Nov 2023
pretreatment
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires
Nov 2023
pretreatment
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires
Dense stand conditions in Long Meadow Grove prior to recent wildfires

Long Meadow Grove

References

Find more giant sequoia science by searching the GSLC Scientific Publications Library.

Explore more groves or learn about the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition.

Disclaimer

The information presented in the Giant Sequoia Grove Health & Resilience Assessment is intended to supplement on-the-ground knowledge of giant sequoia groves for use in conjunction with current on-the-ground knowledge of grove condition and management activities when planning fuel treatment and reforestation projects. It should not be considered the only source of information about the condition of groves.